If Roe v. Wade is sacrosanct, why wasn’t Dred Scott v. Sandford?

Naturally those Left-leaning individuals out there who choose ad hominem attacks over rational debate will probably call me a racist for asking the question in the title of this post.  All without bothering to investigate whether I thought the Supreme Court’s Dred Scott v. Sandford ruling was good and appropriate.  (I do not, by the way.  Duh.)

Not that my question matters to any of those Left-leaning individuals whom Rajan Laad had in mind with his commentary at American Thinker titled, Decoding the leak from the US Supreme Court, available at https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2022/05/decoding_the_leak_from_the_us_supreme_court.html.

Mr. Laad had in mind only those Left-leaning individuals who crave, desire, and unquenchably lust for power above all else.  They seek nothing but power.  Not rational debate.  Not civil discourse.  Not any of the things which underpin a Republic predicated upon Representative Democracy.  No, Mr. Laad had in mind those individuals whose wills are bent upon acquiring, accumulating, appropriating, aggregating, concentrating, consolidating, grasping, holding, maintaining, and wielding raw unquenchable power.  The only democracy about which they care, based upon their own actions, is mob rule.

And from where I sit, the modern Democrat Party has been completely hijacked by such individuals.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.